Protecting Ontario Ratepayers from Solar Fraud
July 23rd, 2010Toronto Blackout July 5th 2010
July 14th, 2010I commented several times on the Toronto blackout of July 5th on CBC television and radio on July 6th. Attached is an article, called “Green Blackout”, expanding upon the points raised in the CBC interviews, particularly the role of careless environmental advocates in undermining the reliability of Toronto’s electricity transmission system. The article appeared in the on-line edition of the National Post July 7th and the print edition July 8th. The article was subsequently discussed by various media outlets including by John Tory on CRFB radio on July 9th.
Bruce Power CEO Discussing Failure of Ontario’s New Nuclear Procurement (2009)
July 12th, 2010Proceedings of the Standing Senate Committee on
Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources
Issue 7 - Evidence - June 1, 2010
OTTAWA, Tuesday, June 1, 2010
The Standing Senate Committee on Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources met this day at 5:10 p.m. to study the current state and future of Canada’s energy sector (including alternative energy).
Senator W. David Angus (Chair) in the chair.
Testimony of Duncan Hawthorne CEO of Bruce Power, questioned by Senator Mitchell, follows.
Background: Bruce Power is AECL’s largest customer, with AECL operating under a $4 billion contract for Bruce A refurbishment. The project now behind schedule and over budget. From federal government budget allocations, it is clear that Bruce Power is obtaining AECL’s services at significantly less than cost. The Ontario new nuclear bid process referred to in the following exchange required the bidders to assume the risk of cost overruns, similar to the way renewable developers are responsible for cost overruns.
++++
Senator Mitchell: That is excellent.
You have made an impassioned plea on behalf of CANDU reactor technology, and it makes a great deal of sense. There is some suggestion that the new ARC-1000 reactor technology has certain problems and may not be accepted in Ontario. Can you comment on that?
Mr. Hawthorne: Yes. I will explain that in two points. First, I was part of the bid process in Ontario because I was on the steering committee. Every one of the bids was ugly. They were all significantly higher than anyone expected, but they were also all significantly higher than any bid anyone has seen anywhere in the world for a new nuclear plant to date. We had to ask what type of questions we had asked. I think we asked the bidders to price in many risks that they would not normally take, and they added a significant premium, so we ended up with very high bids from all the bidders.
On the ACR-1000, the only compliant bid we received came from AECL, but it was still far too high. The reality is that the design for the advanced CANDU reactor is not complete. There is a question mark as to how much it will cost to complete and, when it is completed, what the market will be for it. As we talked about earlier, an attractive feature of the current CANDU design is that it does not use enriched fuel. The ACR-1000 does. We have now perhaps lost one of our attributes in order to get into another market.
I personally do not think that is the right strategy. We do not have to compete head to head with people we cannot beat. My personal feeling is that we have to offer a product that they do not have.
Update on Solar Gold Rush
July 10th, 2010The National Post has carried a story July 7, 2010 indicating that a dim light is starting to glow in the mind of the McGuinty government that some of their Green Energy Act ideas were actually insane and profoundly damaging to Ontario.
Ontario government officials and agencies, together with the interest groups feeding off the Green Energy Act subsidies rarely miss an opportunity to declare the program a “success”. For Ontario consumers, success equals failure. As solar generation is added to the system, the rate impact will be great enough to choke off an equal or greater amount of load than the solar generators will actually serve applying conventional price elasticity estimates for electricity. This effect on load will drive rates even higher to cover the now largely fixed costs of the power system.
The interest groups feeding off the Green Energy Act subsidies are now ramping up a massive lobbying campaign to keep the subsidy spigot open a little longer. See for example the Facebook “Save the Micro-FIT Solar program in Ontario” and also this energy company: Green and Clean
A note from September 2009 anticipating a huge solar gold rush was posted here:
Update on AECL’s Commercial Disaster Happening in New Brunswick
July 7th, 2010Here is an article with updated information on the Point Lepreau nuclear refurbishment in New Brunswick.
Interestingly, no journalists have been tracking AECL’s comparable problems going on at Bruce Power.
Ontario Wind Farm Productivity and Variability by In-service Year
July 2nd, 2010This post provides data current to June 30, 2010 on the productivity and variability of output of Ontario’s wind farms. The tendency of more productive wind farms to produce power with greater annual variability of output is observed. An error in the data reported in the April 6, 2010 edition of the report with respect to Prince Farm is noted and corrected in this edition. The life-to-date capacity factor of Ontario’s large wind farms considering only full power years is 29.0%.
PDF link: ontario-wind-farm-productivity-and-variability-by-inservice-year
Upcoming TV Appearance - Business News Network June 29 12:30-1
June 29th, 2010Federal Environment Minister Jim Prentice announced plans to introduce regulations to phase out older coal-fire plants. How feasible is the policy? Should we demonize coal?
Politicized Power Governance Costing New Brunswick Consumers
June 24th, 2010The dominant paradigm in Canadian electricity policy for about a century was that public power, with its government-backed borrowing and tax advantages, would deliver lower cost power than regulated or competition-oriented private alternatives. As many supporters and detractors of public power have recognized, the vulnerability of this model was the risk of politicized business decision making. Adam Beck was reported to have remarked that he sought to build a “band of iron” around Ontario Hydro to protect it from politicians. In Ontario, the governance weaknesses of public power were crystallized with the passage of the Green Energy Act in 2009. In New Brunswick, a similar breakdown in governance appears to be underway, with the opposition Conservative leader Mr. Alward, representing a party currently without an electricity policy, issuing declarations on keeping obsolete generators in service.
Resisting Ontario Power Bill Rip-Off
June 15th, 2010One Ontario taxpayer/ratepayer has had enough of the Ontario power bill rip-off and is taking action. In an unprecedented submission to the Ontario Energy Board filed today, retiree Parker Gallant is demanding that the Ontario Energy Board reverse a recent ruling that allowed the Ontario Sustainable Energy Association (OSEA) to bleed ratepayers for costs incurred advocating for more subsidized transmission service for wind and solar farms. The Ontario Energy Board award in favour of OSEA appeared to accept OSEA’s claim that “We represent the consumer interests“. Gallant counters that OSEA as a front organization for Governments at two levels”, pointing out that OSEA is sucking up taxpayer cash from two Ontario government ministries, two taxpayer-funded Ontario government agencies, and one taxpayer-funded City of Toronto agency. Gallant concludes “OSEA obtained a favourable ruling from the Board in its May 21, 2010 Decision on Cost Eligibility under false and misleading information from OSEA. It is therefore necessary for the Board to reverse the elements of its Decision on Cost Eligibility that allowed OSEA to absorb an even greater quantum of public funds than it has already.“
The same decision of the Ontario Energy Board that allowed OSEA to sextuple dip taxpayers and ratepayers also dinged ratepayers for the costs of promoting the interests of the Association of Power Producers of Ontario (APPRO), the Canadian Wind Energy Association (CanWEA), and the Ontario Waterpower Association (OWA) in the Board’s transmission planning review.
Ontario Energy Minister Duguid: Taxes are Good, the More the Merrier
June 15th, 2010Yesterday, Ontario Energy Minister Brad Duguid told 570 News that the higher electricity taxes are the more you will save on your bill.